This is the kind of issues i work with. It is sometimes noce to notice how global the work is. Though the text might seem tedious, the content is good. The Daily Star Web Edition Vol. 4 Num 105
despite all expectations...
the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (a triology in 5 parts) really did deliver. At least, so it felt back in time when i read it. Interesting thought, can it be re-read with the same result? Usually it seems a bad idea to revisit your dreams, and try to re-enact good experiences, as the copy is always partly filled with additional expectations. I read it, i got lost in it, it was important. If i would be dissapointed now, does that make the books lees important, does it degrade my original euphoria? I would like to think not. See more progress on: Read “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”
Comments