time passes on, and it is quite nice. Some people are angry at blogging since it messes with their serarch results. Others call all bloggers moreon without anything to say. One reaction to that was a discussion on the nature of blogs, whether they should be seen as online commentary of daily events, or as diaries. I think they are a bit of both, and mostly written for the hell of it, not caring about the over priced preciousness of so called seriour discourse. It is real nice to let your hair down once in a while, and mostly for yourself, as most input makes little or no sence in this respect to outsiders. That's okay too, it is a part of that freedom. Silly, yes, but so what?
despite all expectations...
the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy (a triology in 5 parts) really did deliver. At least, so it felt back in time when i read it. Interesting thought, can it be re-read with the same result? Usually it seems a bad idea to revisit your dreams, and try to re-enact good experiences, as the copy is always partly filled with additional expectations. I read it, i got lost in it, it was important. If i would be dissapointed now, does that make the books lees important, does it degrade my original euphoria? I would like to think not. See more progress on: Read “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”
Comments